Okla. AG Spells Out Multiple Injury Trust Fund ‘Obligations’

16 Sep, 2026 Frank Ferreri

                               
Document File

Oklahoma's attorney general spelled out just what "annual obligations" meant when it came to the state's Multiple Injury Trust Fund.

Document

In re Question Submitted by Kannad, No. 2026 OK AG 14 (Okla. Atty. Gen. 09/09/26)

What Happened?

An Oklahoma legislator asked the attorney general to clarify what constitutes the Multiple Injury Trust Fund's (MITF) "annual obligations" for purposes of calculating the yearly assessment charged to insurers and self-insurers under the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act.

Rule of Law

In Oklahoma, Multiple Injury Trust Fund was created by the Legislature for a single purpose: "to insulate employers from having to pay permanent total disability benefits to a previously impaired worker who suffers an additional work-related injury which prevents the worker from returning to any gainful employment."

To fund the MITF, the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act directs the Workers' Compensation Commission to establish an annual assessment rate—applicable to every insurer and self-insurer doing business in Oklahoma—in an amount "necessary to pay the annual obligations" of the Fund for that calendar year. 8

For purposes of setting this yearly assessment rate, the MITF Director is solely responsible for calculating and providing the Commission with a reasonable forecast of the Fund's "annual obligations."

What the Oklahoma Attorney General Said

While the Act has no standalone definition for "annual obligations," it lists the Fund's various liabilities and spending responsibilities. Those liabilities and responsibilities comprise the annual obligations of the MITF: permanent total disability awards (plus accumulating interest) and any reasonably projected compromise settlements of those awards, along with the Fund's annual payment to the Oklahoma Department of Labor, authorized reinsurance agreements, outstanding loan installments, any unpaid obligations carried forward from previous years, and all administrative expenses incurred by the Fund.

The attorney general detailed that the "applicable portions of the Act empower and instruct" the MITF to make several types of payments:

Permanent total disability (PTD) benefits awarded to eligible claimants

Compromise settlements of PTD claims;Interest accruing on unpaid awards

Administrative expenses

The Fund's annual $1 million payment to the Oklahoma Department of Labor Revolving Fund;Reinsurance obligations

Loan repayment obligations

Unpaid liabilities carried forward from prior years

The Fund's primary annual obligation, the attorney general pointed out, "by far, arises from permanent total disability awards." Such awards in Oklahoma are payable in periodic installments for a period of eight years or until the employee reaches age 65, whichever period is longer.


Glossary Check: In Oklahoma, "permanent total disability" means, based on objective findings, incapacity, based upon accidental injury or occupational disease, to earn wages in any employment for which the employee may become physically suited and reasonably fitted by education, training, experience or vocational rehabilitation.


As a bottom line, the attorney general stressed that the "official opinion" was:

"The 'annual obligations' of the Multiple Injury Trust Fund are the spending categories enumerated within title 85A, sections 31 and 32 of the Oklahoma Statutes: permanent total disability awards, compromise settlements of such awards, and all other authorized expenses and liabilities, as determined by the MITF Director's reasonable fiscal forecast for the upcoming calendar year."

Takeaway

In Oklahoma, the MITF Director's power to determine annual obligations is directly tied to the purposes for which the Fund's revenue may be spent. The MITF Director shall determine the Fund's annual obligations based on a reasonably expected projection of all foreseeable annual spending within the designated categories established under title 85A, sections 31 and 32.


  • AI california case file caselaw case management case management focus claims compensability compliance compliance corner courts covid do you know the rule employers exclusive remedy florida fraud glossary check Healthcare hr homeroom insurance insurers iowa kentucky leadership NCCI new jersey new york ohio pennsylvania Safety safety at work state info tech technology the case manager violence WDYT what do you think women's history women's history month workers' comp 101 workers' recovery Workplace Safety Workplace Violence


  • Read Also

    About The Author

    • Frank Ferreri

      Frank Ferreri, M.A., J.D. covers workers' compensation legal issues. He has published books, articles, and other material on multiple areas of employment, insurance, and disability law. Frank received his master's degree from the University of South Florida and juris doctor from the University of Florida Levin College of Law. Frank encourages everyone to consider helping out the Kind Souls Foundation and Kids' Chance of America.

    Read More