Glossary Check: Or. ‘Suitable Employment,’ ‘Suitable Wage’

13 Jun, 2024 Frank Ferreri

                               

Eugene, OR (WorkersCompensation.com) -- In Oregon, when it is asserted that a worker's current employment precludes the worker from being awarded partial temporary disability benefits, the work must be both “gainful” and “suitable.” But what counts as "suitable employment" in Oregon? Here's how state law defines the term.

“Suitable employment” or “suitable job” means employment or a job:

(A) For which the worker has the necessary physical capacities, knowledge, skills, and abilities;

(B) Located where the worker customarily worked, or within reasonable commuting distance of the worker's residence. A reasonable commuting distance is no more than 50 miles one-way modified by other factors including, but not limited to:

(i) Wage of the job;

(ii) The pre-injury commute;

(iii) The worker's physical capacities, if they restrict the worker's ability to sit or drive for 50 miles;

(iv) Commuting practices of other workers who live in the same geographic area; and

(v) The distance from the worker's residence to the nearest cities or towns that offer employment opportunities;

(C) That pays a suitable wage or would average on a year-round basis a suitable wage;

(D) That is permanent. Temporary work is suitable if the worker's job at injury was temporary and the worker has transferable skills to earn, on a year-round basis, a suitable wage; and

(E) For which a reasonable labor market is documented to exist.

(b) “Suitable employment” or “suitable job” may also be modified or new employment resulting from an employer at injury activated use of the Preferred Worker Program under OAR 436-110, as described in OAR 436-120-0165(1)(c).

“Suitable wage” means:

(a) For the purpose of determining eligibility for vocational assistance, a wage at least 80 percent of the adjusted weekly wage; or

(b) For the purpose of providing or ending vocational assistance, a wage as close as possible to 100 percent of the adjusted weekly wage. This wage may be considered suitable if less than 80 percent of the adjusted weekly wage, if the wage is as close as possible to the adjusted weekly wage.


Case Example

In Saif Corp v. Terry, 869 P.2d 876 (Or. Ct. App. 1994), an injured fruit picker's employment as broiler feeder at Burger King was "'reflective of [claimant's] pluck and the sympathy of the employer’ and did not establish that claimant was competitively employable in a theoretically normal labor market.” 



  • AI california case management case management focus claims compensability compliance courts covid do you know the rule exclusive remedy florida glossary check health care Healthcare iowa leadership medical medicare minnesota NCCI new jersey new york ohio opioids osha pennsylvania Safety state info technology tennessee texas violence virginia washington WDYT west virginia what do you think women's history month workcompcollege workers' comp 101 workers' recovery workers' compensation contact information Workplace Safety Workplace Violence


  • Read Also

    About The Author

    • Frank Ferreri

      Frank Ferreri, M.A., J.D. covers workers' compensation legal issues. He has published books, articles, and other material on multiple areas of employment, insurance, and disability law. Frank received his master's degree from the University of South Florida and juris doctor from the University of Florida Levin College of Law. Frank encourages everyone to consider helping out the Kind Souls Foundation and Kids' Chance of America.

    Read More

    Request a Demo

    To request a free demo of one of our products, please fill in this form. Our sales team will get back to you shortly.