CGRP Therapies Gaining Traction in Workers’ Compensation Migraine Claims

02 Sep, 2025 Cameron Hannum

                               

By Cameron Hannum, Pharm.D., Sr. Clinical Account Pharmacist

Migraines affect around one out of every six Americans in the adult population and can significantly impact workplace productivity and quality of life. For adjusters managing claims involving chronic or post-traumatic migraines, understanding emerging medication options can be the key to approving care that drives real recovery.

One class of treatments gaining traction is CGRP therapies. These medications target the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, blocking either the CGRP protein itself or its receptors, halting the brain signals that lead to migraine pain. Unlike traditional treatments, CGRP therapies are designed specifically for migraines, and they offer relief without many of the sedation or opioid-related side effects that can impair job performance.

Workers' Compensation Considerations

CGRP therapies may be appropriate in workers' compensation claims where the injured employee suffers from post-traumatic headaches following a work-related head injury, or when migraines are aggravated by occupational stressors or environmental triggers. These medications provide a treatment path that prioritizes migraine-specific relief without impairing job performance, critical when evaluating an injured employee's readiness to return to work.

When reviewing requests for CGRP therapies, adjusters should look for clear documentation linking the condition to a work-related incident or environment. There should also be clinical evidence showing that conventional treatment methods were attempted and didn’t improve symptoms enough. Importantly, documentation should indicate how the therapy contributes to functional recovery and potential return-to-work outcomes.

These medications typically cost $600 to $1,200 per month. That may raise a red flag during utilization review. However, they can reduce overall claim costs by shortening disability durations, preventing emergency room visits, and reducing the need for multiple medications. Early safety data is promising, though long-term results are still being studied.

CGRP Therapy Categories

Injectable Preventive Options (Monoclonal Antibodies)

  • Erenumab (Aimovig) - Monthly subcutaneous injection
  • Fremanezumab (Ajovy) - Monthly or quarterly subcutaneous injection
  • Galcanezumab (Emgality) - Monthly subcutaneous injection
  • Eptinezumab (Vyepti) - Quarterly intravenous infusion

Oral and Nasal Options (Receptor Antagonists)

  • Ubrogepant (Ubrelvy) - Oral tablet for acute treatment
  • Rimegepant (Nurtec ODT) - Orally disintegrating tablet for both acute and preventive treatment
  • Atogepant (Qulipta) - Oral tablet for prevention
  • Zavegepant (Zavzpret) - Nasal spray for acute treatment

Key Differences

CGRP therapies fall into two primary formats: injectables and oral/nasal treatments. Injectables, such as monoclonal antibodies, are used preventively and are administered on a monthly or quarterly basis. These tend to have a slower onset of action, taking several weeks to take full effect. On the other hand, oral and nasal receptor antagonists are generally used for acute treatment or prevention and act within hours of administration. Their dosing may be daily or as-needed. In terms of side effects, injectable options may cause injection site irritation or muscle aches, while oral and nasal therapies are more likely to result in nausea or fatigue.

If you’re managing migraine-related claims that aren’t progressing, CGRP therapies may be a key to resolution. These medications are targeted, generally well-tolerated, and support return-to-work goals. Understanding how they work and what documentation to look for can help you make informed, confident decisions that support recovery.

About the author

Cameron serves in a client-facing capacity as part of the pharmacy benefit Management (PBM) team and is responsible for supporting and partnering with insurers, third-party administrators and direct employers in developing and operationalizing strategic pharmacy initiatives for their clinical programs. Cameron has large retail pharmacy chain experience and has worked in the workers' comp PBM industry for many years. 

Cameron is also a regular contributor to the Ask the Pharmacist Series where this article originally appeared.

www.enlyte.com/ask-the-pharmacist

References:

https://headachejournal.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/head.13281
https://headachejournal.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/head.13456
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30661365
https://headachejournal.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/head.14153
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30242830
https://www.ajmc.com/view/estimating-the-economic-burden-of-migraine-on-us-employers

  • AI california case file caselaw case management case management focus claims compensability compliance compliance corner courts covid do you know the rule exclusive remedy florida FMLA glossary check Healthcare hr homeroom insurance insurers iowa leadership medical NCCI new jersey new york ohio osha pennsylvania roadmap Safety safety at work state info tech technology violence WDYT what do you think women's history women's history month workers' comp 101 workers' recovery Workplace Safety Workplace Violence


  • Read Also

    About The Author

    • Cameron Hannum

    Read More