mug gdbdee1212 640

Mich. Top Court Lists ‘Occupational Factors,’ Overrules Old Test

04 Aug, 2023 Frank Ferreri

mug gdbdee1212 640
                               

Lansing, MI (WorkersCompensation.com) -- If you read NCCI's recent Expert Analysis piece, you know that the Michigan Supreme Court recently announced a new standard for mental injuries.

Under the new test, a claimant must show that the mental injury was significantly caused or aggravated by the employment, considering the totality of all occupational factors and all the claimant’s health circumstances and nonoccupational factors.

What are occupational factors that must be considered?

Here's what the court had to say in Cramer v. Transitional Health Services of Wayne, No. 163559 (Mich. 07/28/23), adding that this list is not exhaustive:

--> The temporal proximity of the health problem to the work experience.
--> The physical stress to which the claimant was subjected.
--> The conditions of employment.
--> The repeated return to work after each instance of a health problem.

The occupational factors must be considered together with the totality of a claimant's health circumstances to analyze whether the health problem was significantly caused by work-related events.

What was the old test?

Under Martin v. Pontiac School District, 2001 Mich ACO (Mich. 2001), the factors were:

(1) The number of occupational and nonoccupational contributors to the disability.
(2) the relative amount of contribution of each contributor.
(3) The duration of each contributor.
(4) The extent of permanent effect that resulted from each contributor.

Why didn't the court like the Martin test?

"Martin's strict, four-factor test is routinely misapplied in workers' compensation cases, potentially depriving plaintiffs of benefits to which they may be entitled under the proper test," the court wrote. "Today, this court seeks to remedy this issue and ensure proper application of [state statute] by overruling Martin and adopting a clarified version of the test set forth in Farrington v Total Petroleum, Inc, 501 N.W. 2d 76 (Mich. 1993).

The court send the case back for reconsideration under the new standard.


  • AI artificial intelligence california case management case management focus claims cms compensability compliance courts covid do you know the rule exclusive remedy florida FMLA glossary check health care Healthcare iowa leadership medical medicare minnesota NCCI new jersey new york ohio osha pennsylvania Safety state info technology tennessee texas violence virginia WDYT west virginia what do you think women's history month workers' comp 101 workers' recovery workers' compensation contact information Workplace Safety Workplace Violence


  • Read Also

    About The Author

    • Frank Ferreri

      Frank Ferreri, M.A., J.D. covers workers' compensation legal issues. He has published books, articles, and other material on multiple areas of employment, insurance, and disability law. Frank received his master's degree from the University of South Florida and juris doctor from the University of Florida Levin College of Law.

    Read More

    Request a Demo

    To request a free demo of one of our products, please fill in this form. Our sales team will get back to you shortly.