Missouri Gov. Vetoes Workers’ Comp Bill

                               Jefferson City, MO (WorkersCompensation.com) - Missouri Governor Jay Nixon recently vetoed workers' compensation reform bill SB 572, which included provisions addressing protections for co-employees who are at risk of personal lawsuits for their role in honest accidents. The bill also aimed to make/return occupational disease to being exclusively covered under Missouri's Workers' Compensation System, and also states that all administrative remedies must be exhausted before civil actions involving injury or death filed by the employee can move forward. The following is the Governor's response letter:

I disapprove of Senate Substitute for Senate Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 572. My reasons for disapproval are as follows:

Under current law, workers suffering from work-related occupational diseases may seek redress by bringing a civil action against their employer. This includes workers who suffer from serious and deadly work-related occupational diseases such as mesothelioma and cardiopulmonary disease that involve long-term workplace exposure to toxic substances. Current law appropriately recognizes the severity and duration of these types of occupational diseases, which may take years or even decades to manifest themselves, by allowing affected workers broader redress through access to the civil justice system. Taking this right away from workers suffering from serious and deadly occupational diseases, as Senate Substitute for Senate Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 572 would do by adding “occupational disease” to the workers' compensation exclusivity provision, is not acceptable.

With respect to proposed Section 287.120.11, RSMo, which provides that a civil action against an employer or employee of the employer may not proceed until all administrative remedies are exhausted, it is worth noting that both employers and employees have a shared interest in a timely and efficient disposition of claims.

It is questionable whether holding a civil action in abeyance pending “exhaustion” of all “administrative remedies” – terms that, moreover, are not defined in the bill – furthers these goals. Procedural requirements should foster an efficient and equitable resolution for all parties.

In accordance with the above stated reasons for disapproval, I am returning Senate Substitute for Senate Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 572 without my approval.

Read More

Request a Demo

To request a free demo of one of our products, please fill in this form. Our sales team will get back to you shortly.