Misconduct of Employee General Irrelevance of Employee Fault
Republished with permission from ReduceYourWorkersComp.com
Larson's Workers Compensation Law, Chapter 32, which repeats one of the axioms of workers compensation law, that misconduct of the employee-whether negligent or willful is immaterial in determining compensability unless it takes the form of deviation from the course of the employment, or unless it is of a kind specifically made a statutory defense by a jurisdiction, has also been revised. Fault can sometimes work its way into the issues in subtle fashion, however.
For example, in a North Carolina case, Hassell v. Onslow County Bd. of Educ., 362 N.C. 299, 661 S.E.2d 709 (2008), the state supreme court, in a divided opinion, affirmed a denial of benefits to a teacher who claimed her general anxiety disorder condition was compensable because it was caused by the stresses and strains of dealing with her unruly classes.
One justice dissented, noting that while the majority had disavowed any language from the state Industrial Commission premising compensability on the absence of fault-the Commission had indicated the cause of the teacher's anxiety disorder was her "inadequate" job performance-the majority's findings had failed to address whether the Commission, and the state's Court of Appeals, had relied upon the erroneous premise. [See Larson's Workers Compensation Law, Ch. 32, § 32.02 n2]
Disclaimer: WorkersCompensation.com publishes independently generated writings from a variety of workers' compensation industry stakeholders. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of WorkersCompensation.com.