• Premium News Login
  • WorkCompResearch Member Login
  • Solutions
    • WorkCompResearch
    • Virtual Claims Kit
    • FlashFormSSL
    • Advertising, Branding and Promotional Services
    • Insurance Center
    • CompEvent Conference Registration
  • News, Blogs & Events
    • News Center Home Page
    • View All Articles
    • Featured News
    • The Experts View
    • Current News
    • From Bob's Cluttered Desk
    • Workers' Comp Blog Wire
    • Workers' Comp Best Blogs
      • 2019 Best Blogs
      • Workers' Comp Best Blogs 2018
      • Workers' Comp Best Blogs 2017
      • Workers' Comp Best Blogs 2016
    • Corporate News
    • Calendar of Events
  • State Info
  • Forums
  • Kid's Chance

  • WorkCompResearch Login
  • Premium News Login
  • Request a Demo






Simplifying the Work of Workers' Compensation


Quick Help Center

I Need Workers'
Comp Insurance

I'm Injured
What Do I Do?

Simplifying the Work of Workers' Compensation


I Need Workers'
Comp Insurance
I'm Injured
What Do I Do?

Workers Comp Blogwire

  • Home
  • News, Blogs & Events
  • Workers Comp Blogwire

Worker's Pot Smoking Prior To Feeding Grizzly Bears Does Not Defeat Montana Comp Claim

  • 05/17/10
  • LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Community


LexisNexis®

By Thomas A. Robinson

While the facts of the case were hotly contested, the petitioner, Hopkins, contended that he was employed by Kilpatrick at "Great Bear Adventures," a privately owned bear park. The bear park contained grizzly and black bears and was generally open to the public from Memorial Day through Labor Day each year. Customers observed the bears from their cars while driving through the park. Hopkins testified that Kilpatrick paid Hopkins and other employees daily, in cash, and that his duties consisted of general maintenance, the feeding of various bears, and other miscellaneous chores. Hopkins testified that while most of the employment activities occurred during the tourist season, there was some general maintenance required year round and Hopkins also fed the bears on some occasions after the season ended, up until the time the bears hibernated each year.

On November 2, 2007, Hopkins sustained severe injuries when he was attacked by one of the grizzly bears during a feeding session. He sought workers' compensation benefits, contending that his injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment. Kilpatrick countered that the bear park had no employees, that no employment relationship existed between Hopkins and Kilpatrick, and that Hopkins' services had been provided on a volunteer basis only. Kilpatrick also contended that the major contributing cause of Hopkins' injuries was Hopkins' marijuana use on the morning of the incident. Hopkins admitted smoking marijuana with other employees on the morning of the incident, but claimed the use of the illegal substance had nothing to do with the bear attack.

Here's what the Montana Workers' Compensation Court decided:

In Hopkins v. Uninsured Employers' Fund, 2010 MTWCC 9, WCC No. 2008-2152 (May 4, 2010), Worker' Compensation Court Judge James Jeremiah Shea found that Hopkins was, indeed, an employee of Kilpatrick, that Hopkins sustained compensable injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment, and that Hopkins' use of marijuana was not a major contributing cause of his injuries. Hopkins use of marijuana did not, therefore, disqualify him from receiving an award of benefits. Judge Shea concluded that "[w]hen it comes to attacking humans, grizzlies are equal opportunity maulers; attacking without regard to race, creed, ethnicity, or marijuana usage." The judge characterized Hopkins use of marijuana to "kick off" a day of working with grizzly bears as "ill-advised" and "mind-bogglingly stupid." There was no evidence, however, that the pot smoking contributed significantly to Hopkins' injuries.

Thomas A. Robinson is the primary upkeep writer for Larson's Workers' Compensation Law (LexisNexis) and Larson's Workers' Compensation, Desk Edition (LexisNexis).

This post is provided by LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Community.

LexisNexis®

© Copyright 2010 LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Community



Comments

Be the first person to comment!


You must Login or Register in order to read and make comments!


Member Login

Don't Have an Account? Click Here to Register.


Click Here If You Forgot Password

Click Here If You Are Having Problems Receiving Verification Email

Disclaimer: WorkersCompensation.com publishes independently generated writings from a variety of workers' compensation industry stakeholders. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of WorkersCompensation.com.

Email to a Friend

Post Comment or Reply

Search

View By Section

  • View All Articles
  • Featured News
  • The Experts View
  • Current News
  • From Bob's Cluttered Desk
  • Workers' Comp Blog Wire
  • CompBob! Friday Joke

View By Author

  • Liz Carey
  • Frank Ferreri
  • Nancy Grover
  • Judge David Langham
  • Heather Schwartz Sanderson
  • Chriss Swaney
  • F.J. Thomas
  • Bob Wilson
  • Bill Zachry


WorkersCompensation.com, LLC. | All Rights Reserved
About Us | Advertise with Us | Contact Us | WorkCompResearch.com | Privacy Policy | Terms | Advertiser Login