Workers’ Compensation Loss Run Reports - The Trail To Finding Lost Money
Teresa Long | Institute of WorkComp Professionals
Asheville, NC (CompNewsNetwork) - Almost any employer might ask, “What's a Loss Run Report? Why do I need it? Where do I get one?” While it may not sound very exciting, it documents information about your company's Workers' Compensation claims––and that includes where your money is going.
Loss run reports come from your insurance company or Third Party Administrator (TPA). While some reports are more thorough than others, there is always useful information on job-related accidents and claims.
Just as a balance sheet helps business owners understand their the financial strength and capabilities of their company, a good loss run report can guide a Workers' Compensation program in developing risk management plans, tracking the results of current risk management efforts, identifying problem areas and projecting costs.
Yet, because insurance providers send mountains of paper or the loss run reports lack understandable content, many business owners and managers ignore them, failing to recognize the value they offer as a management tool.
Surprisingly, the content of loss run reports varies dramatically. A very basic loss run report offers minimal information (the name of the injured employee, the total cost incurred and a comments column) for employers who want to evaluate and improve their injury management process. They will know very little beyond the number of claims and their total cost.
On the other hand, other loss run reports (see fig. 2) include a wealth of valuable and meaningful data.
The second report has more value for several reasons. First, there are four dates: Date of Injury, Report to Employer, Carrier Notified and Carrier Entry. The timeliness of reporting injuries is a key metric in managing Workers' Compensation costs. The claims costs are much more likely to be lower the faster a business reports a Workers' Compensation injury. A Hartford Insurance Company study showed that even a week's delay can increase claim costs by 10% and that claims filed a month or more after an injury cost an average of 48% more to settle than those reported the first week.
Furthermore, the study supports conventional wisdom – the longer the reporting period, the higher the probability of litigation leading to higher costs. A National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI) study found that litigated claims cost 40% more than non-litigated claims.
Seriously delayed reporting (more than 10 days to report the majority of claims) and a high litigation rate are a recipe for higher costs. Insurance carriers view these as serious red flags, creating a high risk that could lead to higher costs. The desired goal is to report all injuries within 24-hours of when they occur.
By analyzing a loss run's date information, employers can determine if their current injury reporting process (lag time) is effective or could use fine-tuning. If so, this can become the basis for formulating actions to reduce the lag time. Future loss run reports can then be used to monitor progress.
A good loss run report also includes information as to whether or not a claim is litigated. Ideally, a 5% litigation rate is very good (10-15% is good and anything over 20% should be considered a red flag). Nevertheless, a number of legitimate factors can result in higher rates. A good benchmark for comparison can be determined by looking at the statistics available from your State's Workers' Compensation Division.
High litigation rates can signal all is not well on the employer's home front. Rates in excess of your state's average could indicate a need for more and better communication between the injured employee and the employer, a general mistrust of the employer, a fear of losing one's job, mistrust or lack of confidence in the medical treatment being rendered, or general employee job dissatisfaction. Overall, it simply indicates a need to ask more questions, to look at your current process and try to identify the source of the mistrust or dissatisfaction.
Another area of interest is the “claim status” data, which indicates whether a claim is open or closed, and it's important for several reasons. Excessive time lags in care or claims may indicate that a case can be spiraling out of control. Coupled with the payment and reserve information, it also gives a picture of the ultimate cost of claims. Drilling down to the accident description, nature of the injury and particular department can help identify problem areas and point to possible solutions.
Third, the report identifies the type of claim and indicates if the claim is medical only or indemnity, which involves loss time. The percentage of claims that are loss time is another key metric in managing Workers' Compensation expenses. A good target for loss time is no more than 20% – 25% of claims. Higher percentages are a red flag, signaling that the employer needs to look closely at the company's current return to work process and dig further to determine what is occurring.
Fourth, the report includes the occupation code that enables employers to determine if injuries are concentrated in particular jobs. A rash of injuries in one area may be due to inadequate training, poor hiring practices, unsafe conditions or a combination of these. Armed with this information, the employer can take steps to identify and correct the problem.
Date of hire is another valuable data point on the loss run. A high number of injuries among new employees (within the first 30 – 60 days) could indicate improper training or perhaps an inappropriate hire.
Injury codes on loss run reports identify the nature and severity of the injury, the cause of the injury and the body part injured. All of this is critical information for developing, monitoring and strengthening an injury management program. It enables employers to identify trends and high risks of a particular cause of injury, prepare prevention strategies and evaluate the effectiveness of intervention programs. Employers can focus on the activities within the company that create the greatest cost. Other pertinent data can include the departments, locations or states where injuries have occurred.
Determining what should be monitored and how often is also key. At a minimum, loss runs should be reviewed quarterly. However, to keep an injury management program on course, a simple monthly measurement of the average cost of claims – total incurred costs divided by total claims – can be a guide. The total incurred cost is the sum of payments plus outstanding liabilities (or what is yet to be spent). Small incremental changes indicate the program is working well and spikes are a red flag that warrant more analysis.
Understanding the factors that impact Workers' Compensation costs allows employers to design programs that maintain a healthy balance between cost and quality to keep the employer profitable and better serve injured employees.
Since loss run reports may not always provide this critical data, it becomes the responsibility of the insurance agent or the employer to request information they need from the insurance company or TPA. While a common response may be that loss run reports cannot be modified, alternative reports with the desired information can be requested. After all, it is the employees' safety and the employers' bottom line that are at risk.
Teresa A. Long is Director of Agency Services for the Institute of WorkComp Professionals in Asheville, NC, the largest network of Workers' Compensation professionals in the nation. (www.workcompprofessionals.com Teresa was claims manager for 14 years at Walt Disney World and later was Vice President of Risk Management for Sarasota, FL-based Unisource Administrators, Inc.
Be the first person to comment!
You must Login or Register in order to read and make comments!
Enter your email address below and we will send you a link to reset your password.
Disclaimer: WorkersCompensation.com publishes independently generated writings from a variety of workers' compensation industry stakeholders. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of WorkersCompensation.com.