Constitutionality of California’s IMR Procedure Not a ‘Slam Dunk’
Sacramento, CA (WorkersCompensation.com) - On March 20, California’s Third District Court of appeals heard oral arguments in the case of Ramirez v. WCAB. The case involved a constitutional challenge to California’s Independent Medical Review (IMR) procedure. (A more detailed review of the constitutionality of the IMR procedure can be found here). Less than 10 days later, the court issued its decision upholding the procedure’s constitutionality on March 29.
There were a ...
Log in to Your Free Account to Read the Rest....
The article you are attempting to read is part of our free Premium Media Services, offering original content for the workers' compensation community. Please log in to view this content. Don't have an account? Registration is quick and free! Click here for free and immediate access to all the Featured News and Experts' Views.