Gackenbach Addresses Issues Related to Employee Misclassification at National Workers' Comp Conference in Las Vegas

If you chose A, you sided with the court in Pernice v. Harlan Elec. Co., No. 534832 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. App. Div. 06/01/23), which concluded that the electrician was acting with the scope of his employment […]

Sarasota, FL (WorkersCompensation.com) — You might have noticed in our legal- and compliance-oriented stories, we like to give you a little bit of nuts-and-bolts info that we call Workers’ Comp 101. To help you keep […]

If you chose B you sided with the court in Larson. v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, No. 4-22-0522WC (Ill. Ct. App. 05/22/23), which affirmed the Commission’s determination that there was no employment contract, express or implied, […]

If you chose A, you sided with the court in Serrata v. Suffolk County Police Department, No. 534726 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. App. Div. 05/18/23), which held that the special errand exception applied to the claim. The […]

If you chose A, you sided with the court in Dimeo v. Trinity Health Corp., No. 535739 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. App. Div. 05/18/23), which held that the therapist’s heart attack, while it may have been triggered […]

If you selected B, you agreed with the court in Horne v. XL Insurance America Inc., 2023 WL 3354317 (N.D. Miss. 05/10/23), in which the court ruled against the worker, finding that she did not […]