10-10-2009, 02:04 PM
If you had no range of motion in your dominant wrist, could only lift about 3-5lbs and had to wear a splint forever, would you do that or would you consider a total wrist replacement?
A wrist replacement would give you back about 60-70% range of motion (compaired to no ROM) you could pick up more then a few pounds and you wouldn't have to wear a splint. Only thing that seems bad about this is that the wrist replacement would need to be done every 10-15 years.
I was curious and I know it is different but how about some people here who have had a total knee replacement? Was that a last resort or was that indicated at first?
A wrist replacement would give you back about 60-70% range of motion (compaired to no ROM) you could pick up more then a few pounds and you wouldn't have to wear a splint. Only thing that seems bad about this is that the wrist replacement would need to be done every 10-15 years.
I was curious and I know it is different but how about some people here who have had a total knee replacement? Was that a last resort or was that indicated at first?