Hello There, Guest! Login Register
Index    |     Search    |     Members    |     Help

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A question for 1171
#1
I had an IME appointment with my former wc treating doctor.
The information I received from the doctor's office was, "a evaluation of bilateral lower exteremities"

I am 4 months post surgery from a total knee replacement, my 3rd knee surgery of both knees.

Upon arriving at the appointment the nurse took me to x-ray and said we need to take pictures of your back.

My response was, why do you want pictures of my back when this appointment is to evaluate my knees. The nurse's reply was; "not anymore, we have a letter requesting an evaluation of your back"

I cooperated and had the x-rays taken, next was the examination and the doctor took history. The doctor ended with doing a quick exam of my knees. I am having problems with scar tissue and due not have good range of motion so I do not know if this doctor will place me at MMI for the knees, I also walk with a cane.

I called my attorney after the appointment and he was not notified of the change of purpose of the IME.

I have a hearing Thursday of this week to add my back to my wc claim, I have SI joint dysfunction, nerve pain down both legs and in my feet, along with 3 bulging disc.

The IME doctor did say he feels the problems of my back are related to the way I walk.

My question for you is; Is it legal for the insurance company to change the purpose of the IME without notifying my attorney or me?
Also how will the judge view the way the insurance campany setup the IME?

Thank you for reading this post, sorry it is so long.
 
Reply
#2
I am not sure of your state but generally the client of the IME is the carrier and as such the IME can examine and give evidence in any area the client requests.
Since there was an issue on your back I would think the court would want medical evidence to help it make a decision.
thankx for the background information.
trying to give an opinion on a court system and judge that is unknown to me is pure guess work. what would you and your atty have done different if you'd known ahead of time? would the IME have given a different opinion if you knew beforehand?
would it have been less credible?
I think if you knowing would have changed the IME opinion you might have grounds to object.

does that make any sense? I'm not sure if that helps much or if that's what you wanted.
Reminder :
........Each state has their own comp system; POST YOUR STATE to get accurate information. Use the search feature to find information from similar questions.
THANKS FOR POSTING.
 
Reply
#3
Hi Bummer Knees. I have Adult tethered spinal cord syndrome, Bulging discs in cervical , Thoracic and lumbar. As well as Degeneratve disease . But what i wanted to tell you is I was recently diagnosed with bone on bone osteoarthritis in my left knee because of the stress it is under. Ortho Dr said i aquired it because of the way i walk which is shifted to the right and i limp on my right foot. Just thought i would share the reverse . Sher
7 Yr survivor of the NY State workers compensation system
 
Reply
#4
1171, I live and worked in the state of Kansas.

Bummer Knees
 
Reply
#5
1171, I do think Bummer said that their fisrt treating doctor, is the one that refered them to a surgeon for the knee replacement. Being that is so, the treating doctor is their doctor. So if that's is so, how can this doctor then be used as an IME Doctor?

The issue of not knowing of the change in the IME Dx could have then delayed the IME with such treating doctor, and also a change of doctors for an IME to be proper.

http://www.workerscompensation.com/regul...ategory=EE
Reply's are intended solely for informational purposes. They are based on personal opinions, experience, or research and are "not to be taken as fact or legal advice", otherwise, always consult an attorney or a doctor.
 
Reply
#6
This is a different issue then what was asked.
my answer concerned the effect of the worker not knowing ahead of time about the purpose of the exam.
Whether a physician is ineligible to function as an IME on a particular case or not is a different issue. I don't think there is a general answer; it's specific to the court rules of that particular jurisdiction and something the atty should answer.
The worker/applicant should file an objection with the comp court if they believe the doctor does not qualify under the state's IME rules.
Reminder :
........Each state has their own comp system; POST YOUR STATE to get accurate information. Use the search feature to find information from similar questions.
THANKS FOR POSTING.
 
Reply
#7
I understand 1171. I asked because it was a current issue adding to the IME and also the change in the evaluation. I agree the medical evaluation wouldn't have changed anything at present time or future time. The issue also is why a treating doctor was used as an IME was my question was all. I would had thought one or two things. That her Attorney allowed it to take place, knowing it could be thrown out. Or the Attorney didn't work fast enough to get it canceled till a Independent doctor could perfprm the IME. Surely the Attorney would be answering some questions I agree.
Reply's are intended solely for informational purposes. They are based on personal opinions, experience, or research and are "not to be taken as fact or legal advice", otherwise, always consult an attorney or a doctor.
 
Reply
#8
you're welcome bummer.
Reminder :
........Each state has their own comp system; POST YOUR STATE to get accurate information. Use the search feature to find information from similar questions.
THANKS FOR POSTING.
 
Reply
#9
Thank you 1171 for being here on the forum.

I do appreciate the time you take to answers the questions injured workers ask.

Bummer Knees
 
Reply
  


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  1171 - Another Question tbear6410 3 376 11-11-2019, 11:27 PM
Last Post: redsoxfan
  1171 - Question for you.. tbear6410 3 379 10-12-2019, 08:14 AM
Last Post: tbear6410
  1171,,question on paperwork for dismissing claim alagada1 2 2,576 01-22-2013, 03:30 PM
Last Post: alagada1
  question for 1171 and others alagada1 14 8,587 12-18-2012, 10:52 PM
Last Post: jayne
  A question for 1171? Bummer Knees 2 3,164 05-13-2011, 10:42 PM
Last Post: Bummer Knees
  California Injured Workers -- **1171 see post #4 question chrischris 9 15,587 03-03-2011, 03:28 PM
Last Post: murphsmom
  California Question -- 1171? chrischris 2 3,489 09-20-2009, 06:09 PM
Last Post: chrischris
  Question to 1171 re: Voc Rehab katicabogar 8 6,841 01-26-2009, 08:43 PM
Last Post: katicabogar
  question for 1171 risingeagle222 4 3,302 02-28-2008, 12:39 PM
Last Post: 1171
  1171 settlement question for GA please piedmontmountain 4 5,756 01-24-2008, 07:43 AM
Last Post: genegene

Forum Jump:


Browsing: 1 Guest(s)