Workers' Compensation Discussion Forums

I am from the state of Kansas.

My injury was 2005, I've had 2 knee surgerys and 1 total knee replacement.

Treatment has been requested for carpal tunnel, my back, and the right knee.

I received the judge's order in the mail today per this request.

Here is what it says:
Administrative Law Judge pursuant to KSA 44-516 appoints DR. XXX as a neutral physican to examine and evaluate Claimant's right knee, right upper extremity, and back. To make treatment recmmendation, if any. If no treatment is recommended, Dr. XXX is to offer rating and restrictions.

I do have a couple of questions about this order.

Have my injuries, carpal tunnel & back been accepted?

The right knee I previously had meniscus surgery (A wc injury)
since the replacement of the left knee I have started having problems with the right knee.

My other question is; the orthopedic surgeon doing the IME does not do backs or joint replacements. He refers patients needing these services to other surgeons. This information came from Dr. XXX office.

Two of my injuries are not his area of speciality.
Can I request another doctor?

Thank you
Bummer Knees

my opinion:

1. it doesn't say but you should be able to ask the doctor to put their opinion on the issue in the report.
2. sounds like this choice of doctors was not yours in the first place and it'll be up to the judge to change their choice.

Thank you 1171.

From my understanding the doctor being an ortho qualifies to do the IME.

What is your take on this part of the Judge's Order?

Administrative Law Judge pursuant to KSA 44-516 appoints DR. XXX as a neutral physican to examine and evaluate Claimant's right knee, right upper extremity, and back. To make treatment recmmendation, if any. If no treatment is recommended, Dr. XXX is to offer rating and restrictions.

I am interpreting it the same way. Sounds like an IR.

it seems very clear to me: examine and
1)offer opinion on treatment if it's needed else
2) give impairment factors.

which part is confusing you?

The confusing part is not know if the back, carpal tunnel & knee will be added to the claim.

Been having lot of medical problems related to the back with mobility issues.

Bummer ... my interpretation is that is the purpose of the exam to see if treatment is needed for those parts and if so supply it and if not rate you. Isn't there something else you posted that said the back, knee and carpal tunnel were accepted? I just can't remember. If so that's your answer, if not this exam, since it 's being done by a court appt. Dr., will be the deciding factor for the Judge. I saw a spine specialist, an ortho who specialized in shoulders and a PM Dr. for the knee and ankle. The Dr. who did my IR was an Ortho without a speciality. He was court appt. Did I help clear things up a little.??

Capricorn

Cap

I had an IME at the insurance company's request in December.
Their doctor said the back was due to the altered gait, as a result of the knee injury.
Then the doctor went on to say treatment in the past had not been of benifit to me so no future treatment is needed.

I had surgery on the right knee in 07, this was included in the claim. Been having trouble with it since the surgery. All I want is to have it checked-out. Had one doctor tell me I need a knee replacement of ths. The joint replacement doctor treating my other knee tells me I need an MRI done of that knee.

I had a EMG on the right hand & it showed mild/moderate carpal tunnel. The carpal tunnel has been linked to long term use of the cane.