Get Our Free Newsletter

Join 10,000+ of your peers! Get our latest WorkersCompensation.com articles delivered to your email inbox for free

Full name:
Email:
Home | Workers Comp Blogwire | ​3 Essential Elements of Any Return to Work Program

​3 Essential Elements of Any Return to Work Program

By
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

I work with many different employers and insurance carriers, and I've noticed that every company has a slightly different Light Duty program (or Return to Work (RTW) program).  The more successful programs always have these 3 elements in common:

1. Ensure that the injured worker's job duties do not exceed medical restrictions

I have faced this situation many times - - employer tells claimant to return to work in a light-duty job position.  The job duties, however, exceed the claimant's work restrictions and the claimant leaves work.  Employer doesn't want to pay TTD because a light duty job was given to the claimant and he refused to do it.  The Judge or Arbitrator, however, orders employer to pay TTD because the light duty job exceeded the claimant's work restrictions.  No one is happy about this type of situation.

In order to ensure that the claimant is not placed in a light-duty job that exceeds his work restrictions, every employer should have documentation that lists the specific job duties and task analysis for every job position.  In other words, the documentation should spell out the amount of lifting required by the position, the frequency of repetitive activities, the amount of stooping and bending required, etc.  This way, if the claimant attempts to assert that the job exceeds his work restrictions, the employer will have documentation to demonstrate that it does NOT exceed his restrictions.  Without this type of documentation, the Judge or Arbitrator will have nothing more to go on than the claimant's testimony at trial.

Remember…a Judge or Arbitrator WILL order reinstatement of TTD benefits if the light duty job exceeds the claimant's work restrictions.  Avoid this pitfall before it happens by making sure that the job does not exceed the claimant's work restrictions 

2. All return to work offers must be in writing

Another common situation - - employer tells claimant over the phone that he is to return to work on Monday.  Claimant doesn't show up for work, TTD benefits are terminated, and often the claimant's job position is eliminated due to his no-call no-show.  12 months later when the case goes to trial, claimant testifies that employer NEVER asked him to return to work.  I produce the supervisor as a witness who testifies that he told claimant over the phone to return work.  Claimant testifies that was never said.  Judge rules in favor of the claimant and orders employer to pay 12 months of TTD benefits even though we offered to bring claimant back to work.

This trap is EASY to avoid….make sure that the return to work offer is always in writing - - email works just as well as a mailed letter.  With this, claimant cannot later claim that he was never told to return to work.  Problem solved before it ever becomes a problem.

3. Make sure that the light duty job passes the “straight face” test

If you follow this link you will see a story from Louisiana where Walmart assigned a claimant on light-duty to sit in a chair in the restroom.  

http://www.nbc12.com/story/25604867/walmart-employee-on-light-duty-claims-bathroom-assignment-is-punishment

This is an example of a light duty job that does NOT pass the “straight face” test.  If this claimant were to simply walk off the job, he would then argue that this was not a legitimate job and, in all likelihood, a Judge or Arbitrator would agree with him and claimant would be awarded TTD benefits even though the employer tried to return the claimant to work 

Make sure that the RTW job fulfills some legitimate need or purpose within the company.  If you use this Walmart job as an example, it would have been perfectly acceptable to have the claimant clean the restrooms as part of his light duty job.  Walmart could have told the claimant to sit outside the restroom and monitor the cleanliness of the restroom every 30 minutes or so. However, ordering him to actually sit in a lawn chair IN the restroom transforms what would have been a legitimate job into one that appears vindictive, punitive, and illegitimate.  

About the Author

Attorney J. Bradley Young

J. BRADLEY YOUNG is a partner with the St. Louis, Missouri law firm of Harris, Dowell, Fisher & Harris, where he is the manager of the Worker's Compensation Defense Group and represents self-insured companies and insuranc

Rate this article

0

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (0 posted)

total: | displaying:

Post your comment

  • Bold
  • Italic
  • Underline
  • Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha
  • Email to a friend Email to a friend
  • Print version Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
The CompNewsNetwork is brought to you free of charge courtesy of these fine sponsors:

Powered by Vivvo CMS v4.7