Home | News | Cleaning Case: Should The Petitioner Be Entitled To WC Benefits?

Cleaning Case: Should The Petitioner Be Entitled To WC Benefits?

28 October, 2009 11:19:00 compnewsnetwork
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

Trenton, NJ (CompNewsNetwork) - 07-25942 decided on October 13, 2009 by the Honorable Emille R. Cox, J.W.C
 
Petitioner was injured providing cleaning services for the respondent, a homeowner.  She alleged she was a domestic employee under N.J.S.A 34:15-36, rather than an independent contractor.  The compensation judge, however, found that the petitioner was an independent contractor mainly because she was not subject to any right of the respondent to control the details of her work.

Add to: LinkedIn LinkedIn

Comments (0 posted):

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Comments must comply with the WorkersCompensation.com Terms of Service


Once you've submitted a comment, it has been saved, and will be visible after moderator's approval.
  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
You're Reading A
Featured Series
Coming In 2010

A year long series covering the trends and changes that will shape our industry, from some of the most influential names in comp today.

Only from the WorkersCompensation.com CompNewsNetwork
A News Partner
PR Newswire
Rate this article
0