Is Australia Becoming the Ultimate Sissy State?
Normally I would refer to proposals such as the ones being considered in Australia as "Nanny State" regulation, but this doesn't even rise to that ignominious level. No, this is pure Sissy State stuff.
Safe Work Australia has outlined a draft code of practice designed to address bullying in the workplace. These codes would be admissible in court cases, and would allow for employees to collect workers' comp when they are victims of workplace meanies and bad, bad men.
To say these rules are broad would be a blatant understatement. In fact, they are designed to mirror the national code of the federal public service policy on bullying, which even prohibits "eye-rolling responses" that might "diminish a person's dignity". We are not talking about your basic good natured office based toilet dunking swirly; No, they are looking at a broad swath of evil and inappropriate behavior.
Some other beauties in this proposal?
Workers left idle or underutilized may be able to file for workers' compensation, as the code lists "not providing enough work" as a form of "indirect bullying".
Also in the "indirect bullying" category; a manager who constantly changes deadlines or sets timelines that are difficult to achieve may trigger such a claim.
Employers are advised to ban pranks and discourage "exclusive clubs or cliques", so workers are not "ostracized" by colleagues.
My favorite part is that Safe Work Australia cannot actually use the words "bully" or "victim" in their proposed rules, having been forced to remove them from an earlier version of its draft code after objections from WorkCover, the state comp agency. WorkCover felt that the terms would "label" people. The latest draft instead reads that people who behave in such a manner might be "unintentional" bullies.
That is much nicer. I would rather be known as an unintentional bully; a person too stupid to know that their behavior is evil, hurtful and beneath contempt. In essence, an unintentional bully is a victim of a system that has clearly failed them. Of course, it just might be that the unintentional bully was just trying to do his stupid job, and is working with a bunch of namby pamby, thumb sucking pantywaists.
This is beautiful. They ban bullying in the workplace, making it a compensable event, but cannot label the bully as a bully, because it is apparently a hurtful and bullying thing to do. I suppose the unintentional bully could then go out on workers' comp as well, having been victimized by a mean and vicious label. At this rate it won't be long before the whole country is sitting at home pouting and waiting for a check.
Employers are understandably pushing back on this moronic idea. Mark Goodsell, a representative of the Australian Industry Group who serves on the board of Safe Work Australia, said, "Every time something happens that an employee doesn't like - including reasonable and necessary and constructive criticism and performance management - they will say they feel bullied." Goodsell also believes that employers will start paying "go-away money" to avoid court cases.
Implementation of the code has been delayed while a parliamentary inquiry into bullying is conducted. I'm sure the people who developed this code feel that Prime Minister Julia Gillard, who ordered the delay, is a mean spirited, albeit unintentional, bully. They probably are all home on leave, awaiting their first comp checks.
I must say, I am truly disappointed. I have never been to Australia, but have long felt a strong affinity for the Aussie population. My mental image of them is that of a rough and tumble lot, working and playing hard; enjoying life and living large. I never once envisioned them as whiny, effeminate sissies.
I am left to wonder, at what point does an employers responsibility for an employees health, well being and happiness end? I am not a proponent of workplace bullying, and do not support such behavior in any way, but these draconian restrictions strike me as absurd. At some point we have a responsibility for our own lives, and there are other remedies available to us when confronted with a real, rather than imagined, office bully. I am reminded of one of the best solutions when I think of an old Cheech & Chong skit, when a judge portrayed in the skit says, "Bailiff, whack his pee-pee".
Seems like a perfectly reasonable and efficient method with which to deal with workplace bullies, unintentional or otherwise. Unless, of course, you live in the ultimate sissy state.
Email this story to a friend (above right) or share it with your social network!
About From Bob's Cluttered Desk - "A Place Online for our CEO to Opine"
Robert Wilson is President & CEO of WorkersCompensation.com, and "From Bob's Cluttered Desk" comes his (often incoherent) thoughts, ramblings, observations and rants - often on workers' comp or employment issues, but occasionally not.
Bob has a couple unique personality characteristics. He firmly believes that everyone has the right to his (Bob's) opinion, and while he may not always be right, he is never in doubt. Enter at your own risk, and like all of our blog areas, we encourage you to read the disclaimer at the bottom of the page.
We're not responsible for this guy.....
Bob is an accomplished speaker for the workers' compensation industry. He is available for conferences, corporate events, children's birthday parties and Bar Mitzvahs. You may access his Speakers Brief here.
Join Bob and over 8,500 employers and professionals on his co-managed LinkedIn group - the Workers Compensation Roundtable. Join here today!




Over the last 10 years has been a gradual and significant increase in the number of 'mental stress' claims. These are often long-term and expensive claims, with a breakdown in the employee employer relationship.
The term bullying has become a catchall. Cases extend from a severe level of bullying to situations where employees feel they are not treated with respect during, for example, a performance review.
A few years ago in Victoria there was an awful case of bullying. A teenager working in a cafe was subjected to extreme bullying and committed suicide. This 'Brodie' case received widespread attention in the news. There has been a substantial increase in the level of bullying and harassment claims since then.
The heart of the issue is poor management and poor organisational culture. A number of agencies are trying to deal with this issue, but are tackling it at the end stage when there are problems.
It is going to be some 5 to 10 years before we get better solutions in place, focusing on positive ways of engaging employees and addressing lack of experience and skills and quality management.
Many have likened this to the RSI epidemic in Australia in the 80s. There was a raft of initiatives to try to manage arm pain or RSI, many of them medical approaches that only made the condition worse. It took some years for employers to realise they had a major role to play, and they started doing more to look after you the groups of people at risk of this problem. Around the same time medical practitioners saw that they were doing more harm than good, and the courts rejected a major case where there was slim evidence work had contributed.
We need a similar approach for this problem - employers recognising the have a key role to play, rather than regulators trying to patch up when the difficult and complex problems turn into a claim.
I'm not sure I'd call Australia a sissy state, but I agree regulation has a good chance of causing unintended consequences and a poor chance of making a difference. Our regulator is having its own problems. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-25/workplace-watchdog-accused-of-bullying-intimidation/4334274?section=vic
A great article????
There is a difference. I just think some people should grow a pair and not take all adversity (like a hard job or demanding schedule) as some form of bullying.
Take some personal responsibility, for crying out loud, and don't be such a pantywaist. :)
Post your comment